leopardsqueezy's Blogs


5,259 Points (Ranked 155th)

View My: Profile | Collection | Wishlist | Reviews | Blogs | Friends | Points

The Dork Boundary

Published: Fri 20 Nov, 2009 | 25 Comments

I've never thought of myself as being inherently geeky, dweebish, etc. Often my perspective of myself is somewhat the opposite. I'm not fat, or particularly skinny. I hike during the weekends and go to the gym. I don't program code, or design websites. I'm not part of a Halo clan or something. I think people who belong to things they like to call 'clans' are either complete dweebs or white supremacists.

 

But, right before this, I commented on someone elses blog. I stated vehemently that I would rather - MUCH rather - crash down and play a new RPG all night than go out on the town. Plus, the other night, a mate texted me to go out and see a movie whilst I was playing Forza 3... I finished the race I was doing at the time, which put me up another level (which = new prize car). When I saw what the prize car was, I replied "Nup. Bizy".

 

That's normal. Right? Uh, right? (cue ambient crickets)

 

Perhaps that sounds like solid "game-dork" behavioural patterns to you. These recent occurences got me thinking about exactly that. How do you set the boundaries in deciding whether somone is just a regular guy/gal who plays games (sweet as) or a complete cyberdork (not good)?

 

Because I think that the latter is not a nice thing to be labelled with, even if it does actually represent reality. The classic image of the "gamer" to many people, even in tech-savvy 2009, is that of a sweaty, corpulent bloke, with a curiously misplaced arrogance, reeking of BO and surrounded by discarded corn snack and soft drink containers. He wears a brace for his permanently OOS'd wrist. Perhaps his mum holds a pot behind his ass when he wants to toilet (see South Park "World of Warcraft" episode). Not the best image, for sure.

 

But here's me, a normal-looking, relatively fit and healthy bloke, a relatively non-programmy bloke, and I'm fairly certain I've got gaming habits (or have displayed habits in the past) that probably give our pathetic stereotype above a run for his money.

 

Consider that:

- I had, at one particular point in time, 3 different characters on Oblivion, each more than 150 hours, 2 of them over 200 hours.

- I have racked up 170 hours on DS Bleach: Dark Souls

- I have more than 200 hours clocked on Fallout 3

- I could finish Street Fighter 2, Super Street Fighter 2, Marvel Super Heroes, X-Men vs Street Fighter, Marvel vs Capcom 2, and Sega Rally in the arcades, when I was 15.

- When the 360 launched in March 3 years ago, I pulled 2 sickies on 2 consecutive days just to play a certain launch-day title. I had 30 hours on the clock after those 2 days. And it was f**kin awesome. I regret nothing!!

 

...to name a few.

 

That dork-boundary, it's not a discrete thing. It is actually very analog. Is it determined by appearance, game time counters, spending, spending relative to earnings, number of clans belonged to, how heated up you get when you see someone slagging off your favourite title/console on a forum, er how many days off work you took for a new console launch, your high score? What about how good you are? What about Tana Umaga? Didn't he buy a whole freakin' Gamesman store?!? I'd rate that as hardcore super-game-dork behaviour, but I'll let you tell him coz I'm busy that day ahem cough...

 

So there you go. How would you decide?

 

LS

 


Read all of leopardsqueezy's blogs »» Return to Top

COMMENTS (25)

You must be logged in to post comments.

Log in to comment or Register now!
On 21 November 2009, 01:17PM Posted by Takm3ck
I dont need to decide, you should already know if your a dork or not.

Who uses "dork" anyway?.
 
On 21 November 2009, 02:36PM Posted by leopardsqueezy
OK Takm3ck, you see, if I wrote, say, f**kwit or c**tface, NZGamer probably wouldn't publish the article. If you don't know what those words with the asterisks in them are, go and ask mum or dad to explain them to you. They are what grown-ups call "naughty words".

Also, I suspect that, what with you being a product of NCEA and all, you have failed to grasp the overriding rhetorical and vaguely sarcastic nature of the missive.

I hope any further comments will come from persons with a slightly higher level of language and comprehension skills than Takm3ck here, and god forbid, be of a more constructive nature.

This is the first one I've written so some decent comments would be welcome; that way I know whether or not I should find something else to do when I should be working.

Cheers folks.
 
On 21 November 2009, 04:49PM Posted by takuyafire
I think the "geeky" cliche came from back when PC's and gaming started to make its way in life.

Tbh Im a nerd and I honestly dont care...I enjoy what I do...and most of my mates accept it.

Funnily enough, the only people that dislike my habits are those that are non-PC savvy....people that never used PC's.

So weirdly enough, I find the stereotyping people simply to be those that dont get it.

As for "dorks", there are those that are simply socially inept...they can be dorks...Im supremely outgoing but occasionally I'll say no to the night out so I can relax and hit some anime or play some new game...In my eyes that doesnt count me as a dork...it counts me as the current society norm :D
 
On 21 November 2009, 04:51PM Posted by shadowbandit
If you have a life outside of gaming, I don't think you're really a 'dork'. Maybe a bit anti-social if you'd rather play games than go out with friends. I reckon a true 'game-dork' is someone with no job who lives with their parent/s, and plays games for 12hrs+ every day
 
On 21 November 2009, 07:03PM Posted by p-nutt3r
Don't we gamers have abit of 'dork' in us all?
 
On 21 November 2009, 10:13PM Posted by Srassy
Well, to be fair, when some of my friends go on their night on the town it's hardly the most constructive of events. Staying at home playing Persona 4 is far better for society than hooning around and drinking excessive amounts of alcohol.

That's my reason for staying inside all the times. Yes, I'm a dork. :D
 
On 22 November 2009, 02:22AM Posted by Takm3ck
Reply to leopardsqueezy21 November 2009, 02:36PM
OK Takm3ck, you see, if I wrote, say, f**kwit or c**tface, NZGamer probably wouldn't publish the article. If you don't know what those words with the asterisks in them are, go and ask mum or dad to explain them to you. They are what grown-ups call "naughty words". Also, I suspect that, what with you being a product of NCEA and all, you have failed to grasp the overriding rhetorical and vaguely sarcastic nature of the missive. I hope any further comments will come from persons with a slightly higher level of language and comprehension skills than Takm3ck here, and god forbid, be of a more constructive nature. This is the first one I've written so some decent comments would be welcome; that way I know whether or not I should find something else to do when I should be working. Cheers folks.
Lol.

You wanna metal mate?
Take a joke.
 
On 22 November 2009, 10:14AM Posted by stupidlikeafox
"I could finish Street Fighter 2, Super Street Fighter 2, Marvel Super Heroes, X-Men vs Street Fighter, Marvel vs Capcom 2"

perfectly normal ;)
 
On 22 November 2009, 11:26AM Posted by nimrod76
Im not a dork but I am a gamer-geek/freak what ever the label may be, I would rather spend the night in gaming than going out and getting on the turps, wake up feeling better too.
 
On 22 November 2009, 11:39AM Posted by leopardsqueezy
It was definitely 3D fighting back in the day. Partially what spurred this on was a mate referring to me as the d-word - I almost took offence at it, but then wondered if it was actually true or not.

But see here in some of these comments, people have already voiced slightly different criteria in dishing out that label, so just goes to show.
Takuya, shadowbandit, p-nutter and srassy all made slightly different, but nonetheless valid, points/statements.

"Staying at home playing Persona 4 is far better for society than hooning around and drinking excessive amounts of alcohol.
That's my reason for staying inside all the times. Yes, I'm a dork. :D"

Awesome. Awesome to the max. Stay proud man. I couldn't agree more.

BTW Takm3ck, for the 2nd time, I have failed to fully grasp what it is you are trying to communicate to me. "You wanna metal?" Huh??
 
On 22 November 2009, 12:57PM Posted by Takm3ck
Reply to leopardsqueezy22 November 2009, 11:39AM
It was definitely 3D fighting back in the day. Partially what spurred this on was a mate referring to me as the d-word - I almost took offence at it, but then wondered if it was actually true or not. But see here in some of these comments, people have already voiced slightly different criteria in dishing out that label, so just goes to show. Takuya, shadowbandit, p-nutter and srassy all made slightly different, but nonetheless valid, points/statements. "Staying at home playing Persona 4 is far better for society than hooning around and drinking excessive amounts of alcohol. That's my reason for staying inside all the times. Yes, I'm a dork. :D" Awesome. Awesome to the max. Stay proud man. I couldn't agree more. BTW Takm3ck, for the 2nd time, I have failed to fully grasp what it is you are trying to communicate to me. "You wanna metal?" Huh??
Im sure you have heard that phrase before.

Your mate referred you as being a dork, some mate that is. I did not think that "dork" applied to gamers. Ive only ever heard gamers being called nerds or geeks.
 
On 22 November 2009, 06:05PM Posted by Gazza22
I'm a G.W.S
'Geek With Swag'

Find that balance between games and social activity and you cant go wrong.
 
On 22 November 2009, 06:17PM Posted by SpawnSeekSlay
Good blog & well written, i enjoyed the read :)

imo i dont feel dork is the right word though, dork to me means a stupid person, or idiot/jerk, its vulgar meaning is p*nis/d!ck.
Ive been a jerk my whole life lol and if the person was nicely spoken i was called a dork, if the person was a bit ruder id be called a d*ck lol
I feel gamers are more synonymous with the terms nerd and geek generally.

I like your blog though because i have been thinking the same thing recently.
I mean ive done high school, 4 yr of uni, been working >40hr/wk as a physio for the past 7-8yrs, i go to the gym 3xweek, i mountainbike 1-2xwk, play golf 1xmonth, i plan on buying a kayak soon to do that a few times a week... but yet i do like to play a few hours on my console every 'other' day and go on the net maybe an hour a night.. and?... my girlfriend calls me a 'nerd'... constantly.
lol go figure?
 
On 22 November 2009, 06:33PM Posted by sakuraba
back in the days us gamers may have been seen as dorks by the mainsteam public, but so now that all of the mainsteam public play and endorse games who are the real dorks! haahaa not us!!
 
On 22 November 2009, 06:55PM Posted by tnzk
To be honest I'm not sure. Games have tapped into the male subconscious of competition and alpha male dominance (winning in Call of Duty, getting a new car in Forza), and to that extent it's perfectly normal. However you must admit that putting your energy into a digital lifestyle is pretty darn whack, even if it's everywhere. Imagine society 30 or 40 years ago looking at us now. We're fighting over who cheated in Halo as opposed to fighting over who won in the local rugby game.

Personally I prefer going to the movies or hanging out with mates than playing games, and I play games as time-fillers when I can't do anything else. I do get annoyed if a friend decides to play a game instead of hang out though, it's like, "Damn, you're f**king anti-social, get a life."

Lmao, ridiculous after what I just explained, but true nonetheless.
 
On 22 November 2009, 07:36PM Posted by Nefarious
i think he means 'medal', as in 'you wanna medal'. yeh?
 
On 22 November 2009, 10:48PM Posted by Oliver
Reply to Nefarious22 November 2009, 07:36PM
i think he means 'medal', as in 'you wanna medal'. yeh?
True but I honestly don't see why he lashed out at Takm3ck in the first place. Takm3ck didn't really say anything insulting. This leopardsqueezy guy reminds me of that guy that got banned on the forums for lashing out at guitar93.
 
On 23 November 2009, 09:40AM Posted by username
If you are here, you are a dork.
 
On 23 November 2009, 11:20AM Posted by lexcalibur
I play games, but I wouldn't label myself strictly as a "gamer", I go to the gym, but I wouldn't label myself a "fitness fanatic".

Here's a funny example of the way I look at it. I like dancing. I'm actually quite good too, it's something that just comes naturally to me. But as a guy you can't really say that because in the same way gamers might be labeled "dorks" or "geeks", a guy who says he like dancing is instantly labelled "ghey" (something I don't get seeing gay people are no better or worse at dancing generally speaking). Anyway these titles really mean nothing cause at the end of the day your just a person who enjoys doing something.
 
On 23 November 2009, 11:56AM Posted by leopardsqueezy
For those who are confused, such as Oliver, I didn't lash out at Takm3ck, certainly not in any disproportionate way. His comment was "who uses dork anyway?" - not a very useful comment, most would agree; as the writer of the article, such a comment is vaguely insulting.
And I replied that if I had used, say, f**kwit or c**tface instead of say, "dork" or "dweeb", then it wouldn't be published. I wasn't actually calling him those names, so take it easy. And what would want a medal for, anyway?
 
On 23 November 2009, 12:46PM Posted by Takm3ck
Reply to leopardsqueezy23 November 2009, 11:56AM
For those who are confused, such as Oliver, I didn't lash out at Takm3ck, certainly not in any disproportionate way. His comment was "who uses dork anyway?" - not a very useful comment, most would agree; as the writer of the article, such a comment is vaguely insulting. And I replied that if I had used, say, f**kwit or c**tface instead of say, "dork" or "dweeb", then it wouldn't be published. I wasn't actually calling him those names, so take it easy. And what would want a medal for, anyway?
"what would want a medal for, anyway?"

You dont get out much do you?.
 
On 23 November 2009, 12:50PM Posted by Takm3ck
Reply to Oliver22 November 2009, 10:48PM
True but I honestly don't see why he lashed out at Takm3ck in the first place. Takm3ck didn't really say anything insulting. This leopardsqueezy guy reminds me of that guy that got banned on the forums for lashing out at guitar93.
Thanks Ollie but i guess he could take some offence.

But the rest of the insults arent really necessary, this reminds me of someones comment about how people online make up for their real life alpha male dominance. It could be happening right now.
 
On 23 November 2009, 02:17PM Posted by leopardsqueezy
OK, so I'm gonna go and throw a bucket of iced water over this, because it's just getting carried away. If you weren't trying to be d*ck or anything Takmeck, that's fine; but just for future reference, comments like your very first one are ambiguous and inane, which makes it hard to understand what the author is actually trying to say. That means I have to decide if you're being an ass or not, and sadly, there are people who use the net purely for that purpose. See what I'm saying? I don't particularly want to come across as being mean or whatever to someone for no reason, so lets just let that water trickle along under the proverbial bridge.

And note to Oliver, if you want to see what harsh comments REALLY look like, go check out a YouTube comment page, esp one from a religious-themed clip. Think you'll agree I, and anyone else here, was pretty restrained by comparison.
 
On 24 November 2009, 11:11AM Posted by Kegz
Interesting one.. I consider myself in somewhat of the same camp, I probably have racked up less hours than you, more like in the 40 hour range than the 100-300 but still, makes you wonder where you fit in. The industry, in my view, is splitting between the casual gamer and the um .. more "intensive" gamer.
I'm probably quite happy to be in the former
 
On 2 December 2009, 02:12PM Posted by tnzk
Reply to lexcalibur23 November 2009, 11:20AM
I play games, but I wouldn't label myself strictly as a "gamer", I go to the gym, but I wouldn't label myself a "fitness fanatic". Here's a funny example of the way I look at it. I like dancing. I'm actually quite good too, it's something that just comes naturally to me. But as a guy you can't really say that because in the same way gamers might be labeled "dorks" or "geeks", a guy who says he like dancing is instantly labelled "ghey" (something I don't get seeing gay people are no better or worse at dancing generally speaking). Anyway these titles really mean nothing cause at the end of the day your just a person who enjoys doing something.
Dancing is not, and will never be, gay.

The only people who say it's gay are those dudes in the sidelines looking at you as you're pulling in chicks by the second whereas they have two left feet.

Michael Jackson is the greatest dancer the world has ever seen, and he could bring on girls by the hundreds of thousands.

No, dancing is not gay. I find it funny how people can't dance.
 


BLOG TOOLS

Current Rating from 31 votes:
*****

Rate blog:
leopardsqueezy's Blog »  

ABOUT LEOPARDSQUEEZY

Username: leopardsqueezy
Home Page: No Information
Birthday: No Information
Location: No Information
Interests: No Information
Forum Post Count: 3
Points: 5,259 (Ranked 155th)
PSN Username: No Information

Wii Friend Code: No Information
Xbox Live Gamertag: No Information


ADVERTISEMENT