Nintendo Settles Court Case with Gaming Pirate


Nintendo have announced that they have settled a court case against an individual in Australia who had copied and uploaded the Wii's New Super Mario Bros.

The individual had secured a copy of the title in November last year, a week before its release date - and had uploaded it to the internet, enabling the game to spread rapidly through peer to peer networks.



Naughty gamers got an early taste of the anticipated Wii title, but its Nintendo who got the last laugh. By utilising online detective services they were able to track down the Austrlian individual and indentify them - resulting in a search warrant which uncovered incriminating evidence.

After a quick court battle, Nintendo was able to secure a punitive judgement against the pirate - with a court order forcing the individual to fess up with $1.5 million Australian dollars compensation for the company.

But even after that beneficial settlement Nintendo is talking tough. It issued these fighting words to would-be pirates:

Nintendo guards its intellectual property rights in order to protect the interests of its valued consumers, its own interests, as well as the interests of game development companies. Nintendo will pursue those who attempt to jeopardise our industry by using all means available to it under the law.

Fewer sales of Nintendo’s hardware and software systems means fewer resources that Nintendo, its licensees, developers and publishers have to create and market new video game products which is ultimately to the detriment of video game enthusiasts. When there is a decrease in game development, there is also a decrease in the number of jobs in the industry. The existence of piracy jeopardises the strength of the video game industry overall.


1.5 million is a very large sum for a single individual to pay. But it shows how seriously the gaming industry is treating illegal downloads and distribution.

What do you think - were Nintendo's actions justified here? Or was the compensation demanded too harsh?

Keep it Locked to NZGamer.com for all your gaming news.



» Return to Top

Surrogates
ADVERTISEMENT

RELATED NEWS

 

COMMENTS (14)

You must be logged in to post comments.

Log in to comment or Register now!
On 9 February 2010, 03:58PM Posted by Hervard
"Rapibly"? Nice. ;)
 
On 9 February 2010, 04:08PM Posted by Conrad
Reply to Hervard 9 February 2010, 03:58PM
"Rapibly"? Nice. ;)
ninja edit!
 
On 9 February 2010, 04:09PM Posted by chinaman71
im just amazed he had 1.5 million?

Anyways its harsh-ish but come on dude if your going to do something 'immoral' wise up. Since the defense could use 'research purposes' as an excuse or blame ninetindo themselves for having a copy available that easily so far out from release. Also if it was an unmarked promo etc and he uploaded it he may not know it had 'copyright' etc so many loop holes its funny....
 
On 9 February 2010, 04:20PM Posted by Deanology
Good effort nintendo.
It'll make people think for a few seconds.. Ultimately making them more sneaky, but it was a good effort.
 
On 9 February 2010, 04:49PM Posted by nimrod76
BAM! Take that ye Pirate!!!

Wow big dollars should scare f a few would-be-pirates.
 
On 9 February 2010, 04:53PM Posted by Ziggy
This is just insane. The music industry went through exactly this sort of thing 5-10 years ago, and look where it is now. These excessive punishments don't serve as deterents and aren't going to help the situation at all.
 
On 9 February 2010, 05:08PM Posted by Xenojay
All I've ever noticed about digital pirates, is that they just get smarter, wilier and crazier about exploiting as much of the "pirate" market as possible.

So, this guy got his due, piracy is piracy, but no doubt there's a thousand other pirates going "WE'S GOT THE FUEL TO TAKE DOWN THE MAN!" and trying to get more product that isn't released out to the market.

It's a strange, strange cycle...
 
On 9 February 2010, 06:15PM Posted by RealmEnder
One argument goes that most people who download pirated material would never buy it anyway so is it really a lost sale?
 
On 9 February 2010, 08:44PM Posted by The Host of Chaos
Ouch. On a side note, I still haven't played New Super Mario Bros. Wii.
 
On 11 February 2010, 10:19PM Posted by SpawnSeekSlay
Reply to RealmEnder 9 February 2010, 06:15PM
One argument goes that most people who download pirated material would never buy it anyway so is it really a lost sale?
Good point!
 
On 11 February 2010, 10:22PM Posted by SpawnSeekSlay
"Austrlian individual and indentify them"
Nearly as good as my typos... but not quite, im still better :P
 
On 11 February 2010, 10:27PM Posted by SpawnSeekSlay
The guy will just declare bankruptcy...
He wont pay a dime of that, would be impossible for someone like most of us.

If he goes to court and is ordered to pay it he'll probably just be told to pay $20 a week... which will take 1442yrs lol
 
On 16 February 2010, 06:37PM Posted by Ruptunex
Reply to SpawnSeekSlay11 February 2010, 10:27PM
The guy will just declare bankruptcy... He wont pay a dime of that, would be impossible for someone like most of us. If he goes to court and is ordered to pay it he'll probably just be told to pay $20 a week... which will take 1442yrs lol
Yeah it ain't gonna happen.
 
On 17 February 2010, 10:14AM Posted by guitar93
How did he score a copy in the first place?